MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2810171908 · doi:10.1070/rm9892

Integral norm discretization and related problems

2019· article· en· W2810171908 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueRussian Mathematical Surveys · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicMatrix Theory and Algorithms
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersGeneralitat de CatalunyaNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaMinisterio de Ciencia e InnovaciónMinistry of Education and Science of the Russian FederationCentres de Recerca de Catalunya
KeywordsMathematicsDiscretizationNorm (philosophy)Applied mathematicsAlgebra over a fieldMathematical economicsCalculus (dental)Pure mathematicsMathematical analysisLawPolitical scienceMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The problem is discussed of replacing an integral norm with respect to a given probability measure by the corresponding integral norm with respect to a discrete measure. This problem is investigated for elements of finite-dimensional spaces. Also, discretization of the uniform norm of functions in a given finite-dimensional subspace of continuous functions is studied. Special attention is given to the case of multivariate trigonometric polynomials with frequencies (harmonics) in a finite set with fixed cardinality. Both new results and a survey of known results are presented. Bibliography: 47 titles.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.948
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it