Proteomic Profile of <i>Daphnia pulex</i> using Data‐Independent Acquisition Mass Spectrometry and Ion Mobility Separation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Daphnia pulex is a keystone species for aquatic habitats and an ecological/evolution model organism. Although significant progress has been made on characterizing its genome, the D. pulex proteome remains largely uncharacterized partially due to abnormally high protein degradation during homogenization and emphasis on genomic analysis. In this study, various sample preparation and mass spectrometry acquisition methods are performed for the purpose of improving D. pulex proteome exploration. Benefits for employing both in-gel and in-solution methods of trypsin digestion are observed. Furthermore, acquisition methods employing ion mobility separation greatly increase peptide identification and more than doubled the proteome coverage. Bioinformatic analysis suggests that mitochondrial and hydrolytic activities are enriched in D. pulex compared to closely related invertebrates or Homo sapiens. Also, novel D. pulex proteins possessing putative genome modifying functional domains are identified. Data are available via ProteomeXchange with identifier PXD008455.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".