Classification of First-Episode Schizophrenia Using Multimodal Brain Features: A Combined Structural and Diffusion Imaging Study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Recent neuroanatomical pattern recognition studies have shown some promises for developing an objective neuroimaging-based classification related to schizophrenia. This study explored the feasibility of reliably identifying schizophrenia using single and multimodal multivariate neuroimaging features. Multiple brain measures including regional gray matter (GM) volume, cortical thickness, gyrification, fractional anisotropy (FA), and mean diffusivity (MD) were extracted using fully automated procedures. We used Gradient Boosting Decision Tree to identify the most frequently selected features of each set of neuroanatomical metric and fused multimodal measures. The current classification model was trained and validated based on 98 patients with first-episode schizophrenia (FES) and 106 matched healthy controls (HCs). The classification model was trained and tested in an independent dataset of 54 patients with FES and 48 HCs using imaging data acquired on a different magnetic resonance imaging scanner. Using the most frequently selected features from fused structural and diffusion tensor imaging metrics, a classification accuracy of 75.05% was achieved, which was higher than accuracy derived from a single imaging metric. Most prominent discriminative features included cortical thickness of left transverse temporal gyrus and right parahippocampal gyrus, the FA of left corticospinal tract and right external capsule. In the independent cohort, average accuracy was 76.54%, derived from combined features selected from cortical thickness, gyrification, FA, and MD. These features characterized by GM abnormalities and white matter disruptions have discriminative power with respect to the underlying pathological changes in the brain of individuals having schizophrenia. Our results further highlight the potential advantage of multimodal data fusion for identifying schizophrenia.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".