MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2810290578 · doi:10.1109/tpel.2018.2851570

A Fast and Stable Method for Modeling Generalized Nonlinearities in Power Electronic Circuit Simulation and Its Real-Time Implementation

2018· article· en· W2810290578 on OpenAlexafffund
Zhen Huang, Venkata Dinavahi

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Power Electronics · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicReal-time simulation and control systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaChina Scholarship Council
KeywordsComputer scienceAdmittance parametersMatrix decompositionGaussian eliminationResistorElectronic engineeringCurrent sourceConstant currentMatrix (chemical analysis)Control theory (sociology)Power electronicsGaussianVoltageEngineeringElectrical engineeringEigenvalues and eigenvectors

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Nonlinearities have been the major obstructions that limit the computational efficiency in power electronic circuit simulation for a long time. Yet there is no standard way for dealing with them. This paper presents a new method that makes the handling of nonlinearities fast and stable. In the proposed method, nonlinearities are transformed into a uniform representation - a constant resistor in parallel with a companion current source, thus making the system admittance matrix constant for fixed time-step simulation. To solve for the corresponding companion current source, nonlinearities are treated as either current or voltage sources and a diagonal time-varying matrix equation is developed. Three methods are proposed for solving the matrix equation - precomputed inversion or factorization, modified Gaussian elimination, and updating inverse using the Sherman-Morrison formula - that can fit different system sizes and applications. The proposed method is validated by two common power electronic converter topologies, both in offline and real-time simulation. Offline tests show that the proposed method achieved the same accuracy with the mature simulation software while being more than ten times faster. The same test cases are also implemented into field programmable gate arrays based real-time simulation experiments for verification.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.294
Teacher spread0.279 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations33
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Power ElectronicsSame topicReal-time simulation and control systemsFrench-language works237,207