Onset of miscible and immiscible fluids’ invasion into a viscoplastic fluid
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We simulate fluid invasion into a gelled cement slurry using a scaled laboratory experiment. This process is relevant to the construction of oil and gas wells, in which a tall column of cement suspension must resist fluid invasion through a combination of static pressure, yield stress, and interfacial tension. The sufficiently over-pressured fluids may enter from the surrounding rocks, leading to failure of the well integrity. Here, we model the cement suspension using a Carbopol solution (yield stress fluid) and apply different over-pressured invading fluids through a centrally positioned hole at the bottom of the circular column. We study water, glycerin, silicon oil, and air as invading fluids, in order to delineate the effects of yield stress, interfacial tension, and column height on fluid invasion. We find that the invasion is easiest for miscible fluids that penetrate locally at significantly lower invasion pressures than immiscible fluids. Viscosity affects this process by retarding the initial diffusive mixing of the fluids, which tends to weaken the gel locally. More viscous invading fluids require larger invasion pressures and result in larger invasion domes. The silicon oil penetrated in the form of a slowly expanding dome, resisted at the walls of the column – effectively by a Poiseuille flow above it in the Carbopol. Invasion pressures were significantly larger than those for the glycerin solutions. The largest invasion pressures were, however, found for air, which is influenced approximately equally by interfacial tension and yield stress.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".