MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2810345144 · doi:10.1017/cjn.2018.162

P.060 Utility analysis of continuous video EEG (cvEEG) monitoring during the treatment of hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy (HIE) in the NICU

2018· article· en· W2810345144 on OpenAlexaffvenue
MH Braun, Luis Bello‐Espinosa, Juan Pablo Appendino, J Buchhalter, Khorshid Mohammad, Michael J. Esser

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences Neurologiques · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNeonatal and fetal brain pathology
Canadian institutionsCalgary Laboratory Services
Fundersnot available
KeywordsElectroencephalographyMedicineHypoxic Ischemic EncephalopathyHypothermiaEncephalopathyPediatricsAnesthesiaNeonatal seizureEpilepsyPsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Therapeutic hypothermia (TH) improves the outcome in HIE but cvEEG is vital to detect any seizures that occur. Unfortunately, the costs associated with cvEEG can make it impractical. We studied outcomes in TH with the objective of optimizing the length of cvEEG required. Methods: Term infants with HIE were treated with 72 h of TH followed by 6 h of rewarming. cvEEG reports were quantified (background, sharp transients, seizures) and compared with pre and post-cooling variables to determine whether risk stratification was possible. Results: 25/78 infants had seizures during the TH, however, most seizures occurred early, with 7 infants seizing prior to cooling and 15 having their first seizure within 24h. Only 3 infants had their first seizure between 24-48h and none were recorded after. Novel seizures after 24h were brief and did not require treatment. EEG variables such as frequent sharp transients and first seizures within 24h were correlated with MRI abnormalities. Conclusions: For the majority of infants undergoing TH, 24h of cvEEG may be sufficient with few infants requiring longer than 48h. A combination of clinical variables (abnormal neurological exam) and EEG traits (frequency of discharges, seizures) can help to decide on the likelihood of seizures and length of EEG recording needed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences Neurologiques→Same topicNeonatal and fetal brain pathology→French-language works237,207→