Télécollaboration et autobiographie : un projet croisé FLS/FLE
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A l�automne 2015, un projet de telecollaboration autour de l�autobiographie a ete mis en place entre des apprenants de FLS au Quebec et des apprenants de FLE en Australie. L�approche telecollaborative proposee se basait sur la lecture de textes de litterature migrante et sur l�ecriture de textes personnels. L�objectif de la recherche visait a determiner la pertinence de la demarche proposee pour l�ensemble des apprenants. Si un certain nombre d�objectifs pedagogiques sont communs aux deux groupes, on note cependant des differences liees aux contextes sociaux et aux demandes des institutions. Dans le cadre de cette recherche, des questionnaires completes par les apprenants en amont et en aval du projet ont ete analyses ainsi que les textes echanges entre les participants pendant le jumelage. Les productions autobiographiques individuelles realisees en fin de parcours ont egalement fait l�objet d�une analyse
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.024 | 0.005 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".