MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Endoscopy in Children With Gerd: “The Way We Were”* and The Way We Should Be†

2002· review· en· W2810384669 on OpenAlexaffabout
Eric Hassall

Bibliographic record

VenueThe American Journal of Gastroenterology · 2002
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicEsophageal and GI Pathology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British ColumbiaBC Children's Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineReprintColumbia universityGERDUniversity hospitalGeneral surgeryFamily medicineInternal medicineMedia studiesDisease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Division of Gastroenterology, British Columbia Children's Hospital/University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada Reprint requests and correspondence: Eric Hassall, MD, Division of Gastroenterology, BC Children's Hospital/University of BC, 4480 Oak Street, Vancouver BC V6H 3V4, Canada. Received 19 February 2002; accepted 25 February 2002 * Bergman, Bergman, and Hamlisch (1973). † Pediatric CORI (1999-).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.003
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.303
Teacher spread0.272 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2002
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe American Journal of GastroenterologySame topicEsophageal and GI PathologyFrench-language works237,207