MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2810436264

Numerical Simulation and Customized DACM Based Design Optimization

2018· dissertation· en· W2810436264 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueDuo Research Archive (University of Oslo) · 2018
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicEngineering Applied Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUtdannings- og forskningsdepartementetSimon Fraser UniversityUniversitetet i Stavanger
KeywordsComputer scienceEngineering
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The diverse numerical modelling, analysis and simulation tools that have been developed and introduced to markets are intended to perform the virtual design and testing of products and systems without the construction of physical prototypes. Digital prototyping in the form of computer modelling and simulation are important means of numerical model predictions, i.e. design validation and verification. However, as the tools advance to more precise and diverse applications, the operation eventually becomes more complex, computationally expensive and error prone; this is particularly true for complex multi-disciplinary and multidimensional problems; for instance, in multi-body dynamics, Fluid-Structure Interaction (FSI) and high-dimensional numerical simulation problems. On the other hand, integrating design optimization operations into the product and system development processes, through the computer based applications, makes the process even more complex and highly expensive. This thesis analyses and discusses causes of complexity in numerical modelling, simulation and optimization operations and proposes new approaches/frameworks that would help significantly reduce the complexity and the associated computational costs. Proposed approaches mainly integrate, simplify and decompose or approximate complex numerical simulation based optimization problems into simpler, and to metamodel-based optimization problems. \nDespite advancing computational technologies in continuum mechanics, the design and analysis tools have developed in separate directions with regard to ‘basis functions’ of the technologies until recent developments. Basis functions are the building blocks of every continuous function. Continuous functions in every computational tool are linear combinations of specific basis functions in the function space. Since first introduced, basis functions in the design and modelling tools have developed so rapidly that various complex physical problems can today be designed and modelled to the highest precision. On the other hand, most analysis tools still utilize approximate models of the problems from the latter tools, particularly if the problem involves complex smooth geometric designs. The existing gap between the basis functions of the tools and the increasing precision of models for analysis introduce tremendous computational costs. Moreover, to transfer models from one form of basis function to another, additonal effort is required. The variation of the basis functions also demands extra effort in numerical simulation based optimization processes. This thesis discusses the recently developed integrated modelling and analysis approach that utilizes the state-of-the-art basis function (NURBS function) for both design and analysis. A numerical simulation based shape optimization framework that utilizes the state-of-the-art basis function is also presented in a study in the thesis.\nOne of the common multidisciplinary problem that involves multiple models of domains in a single problem, fluid-structure interaction (FSI) problem, is studied in the thesis. As the name implies, the two models of domains involved in any FSI problems are fluid and structure domain models. In order to solve the FSI problems, usually three mathematical components are needed: namely, i) fluid dynamics model, ii) structural mechanics model and, iii) the FSI model. This thesis presents the challenges in FSI problems and discusses different FSI approaches in numerical analysis. A comparative analysis of computational methods, based on the coupling and temporal discretization schemes, is discussed using a benchmark problem, to give a better understanding of what a multidisciplinary problem is and the challenge for design optimizations that involve such problems. [...]

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.720
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.282
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it