MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2810436264

Numerical Simulation and Customized DACM Based Design Optimization

2018· dissertation· en· W2810436264 sur OpenAlex

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

fundUn bailleur canadien est enregistré sur le travail.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

RevueDuo Research Archive (University of Oslo) · 2018
Typedissertation
Langueen
DomaineEngineering
ThématiqueEngineering Applied Research
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesUtdannings- og forskningsdepartementetSimon Fraser UniversityUniversitetet i Stavanger
Mots-clésComputer scienceEngineering
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

The diverse numerical modelling, analysis and simulation tools that have been developed and introduced to markets are intended to perform the virtual design and testing of products and systems without the construction of physical prototypes. Digital prototyping in the form of computer modelling and simulation are important means of numerical model predictions, i.e. design validation and verification. However, as the tools advance to more precise and diverse applications, the operation eventually becomes more complex, computationally expensive and error prone; this is particularly true for complex multi-disciplinary and multidimensional problems; for instance, in multi-body dynamics, Fluid-Structure Interaction (FSI) and high-dimensional numerical simulation problems. On the other hand, integrating design optimization operations into the product and system development processes, through the computer based applications, makes the process even more complex and highly expensive. This thesis analyses and discusses causes of complexity in numerical modelling, simulation and optimization operations and proposes new approaches/frameworks that would help significantly reduce the complexity and the associated computational costs. Proposed approaches mainly integrate, simplify and decompose or approximate complex numerical simulation based optimization problems into simpler, and to metamodel-based optimization problems. \nDespite advancing computational technologies in continuum mechanics, the design and analysis tools have developed in separate directions with regard to ‘basis functions’ of the technologies until recent developments. Basis functions are the building blocks of every continuous function. Continuous functions in every computational tool are linear combinations of specific basis functions in the function space. Since first introduced, basis functions in the design and modelling tools have developed so rapidly that various complex physical problems can today be designed and modelled to the highest precision. On the other hand, most analysis tools still utilize approximate models of the problems from the latter tools, particularly if the problem involves complex smooth geometric designs. The existing gap between the basis functions of the tools and the increasing precision of models for analysis introduce tremendous computational costs. Moreover, to transfer models from one form of basis function to another, additonal effort is required. The variation of the basis functions also demands extra effort in numerical simulation based optimization processes. This thesis discusses the recently developed integrated modelling and analysis approach that utilizes the state-of-the-art basis function (NURBS function) for both design and analysis. A numerical simulation based shape optimization framework that utilizes the state-of-the-art basis function is also presented in a study in the thesis.\nOne of the common multidisciplinary problem that involves multiple models of domains in a single problem, fluid-structure interaction (FSI) problem, is studied in the thesis. As the name implies, the two models of domains involved in any FSI problems are fluid and structure domain models. In order to solve the FSI problems, usually three mathematical components are needed: namely, i) fluid dynamics model, ii) structural mechanics model and, iii) the FSI model. This thesis presents the challenges in FSI problems and discusses different FSI approaches in numerical analysis. A comparative analysis of computational methods, based on the coupling and temporal discretization schemes, is discussed using a benchmark problem, to give a better understanding of what a multidisciplinary problem is and the challenge for design optimizations that involve such problems. [...]

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Simulation ou modélisation · Signal consensuel: Simulation ou modélisation
GenreSignal candidat: Méthodes · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,720
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,031
Tête enseignante GPT0,282
Écart entre enseignants0,251 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle