Obecność polskich utworów literackich w zagranicznych bibliotekach cyfrowych
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The article contains an analysis of the presence of Polish literary canon in international digital libraries. The main aim of the elaboration is to examine the quantitative dissemination of literary works comprising the canon of Polish literature in main foreign content aggregators and qualitative analysis of the typed collections. The data from the analysis of contents of selected digital libraries comprised the source of the study. As a result of the research, it was established that Europeana provides 1775 units, of which 1434 in Polish and 341 in other languages, Google books provides 764 units, of which 508 in Polish and 256 in other languages, and Internet Archive provides 254 units, of which 235 in Polish and 19 in other languages. The type of analyzed resources was also taken into consideration. Europeana comprised mainly literary and iconographic works, while Internet Access - literary and audiovisual. Google Books provides only text files. The work is concluded by a short analysis of the content providers. For Europeana it was mainly the National Library and the Federation of Digital Libraries, while for Internet Archive - Canadian Libraries. Foreign-language documents come from national libraries of the respective countries.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.011 | 0.056 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.016 | 0.006 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it