MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2810526385 · doi:10.5539/jmr.v10n5p9

Multi-factor Stock Selection Model Based on Kernel Support Vector Machine

2018· article· en· W2810526385 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Ru Zhang, Zi-ang Lin, Shaozhen Chen, Zhixuan Lin, Xingwei Liang

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Mathematics Research · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicStock Market Forecasting Methods
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSupport vector machineStock (firearms)Machine learningMathematicsKernel (algebra)Artificial intelligenceKernel methodPredictive powerMathematical optimizationEconometricsComputer scienceEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In recent years, the combination of machine learning method and traditional financial investment field has become a hotspot in academic and industry. This paper takes CSI 300 and CSI 500 stocks as the research objects. First, this paper carries out kernel function test and parameter optimization for the kernel support vector machine system, and then predict and optimize the combination of market-neutral stock selection strategy and stock right strategy. The results of the experiment show that the multi-factor model based on SVM has a strong predictive power for the selection of stock, and it has a difference in the predictive power of different nuclear functions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.019

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.479
GPT teacher head0.555
Teacher spread0.076 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Mathematics ResearchSame topicStock Market Forecasting MethodsFrench-language works237,207