MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2810526388 · doi:10.1093/mnras/sty1674

Kinematics of the atomic ISM in M33 on 80 pc scales

2018· article· en· W2810526388 on OpenAlexafffund
Eric W. Koch, Erik Rosolowsky, Felix J. Lockman, Amanda A. Kepley, Adam K. Leroy, Andreas Schruba, J. Braine, Julianne J. Dalcanton, Megan Johnson, Snežana Stanimirović

Bibliographic record

VenueMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicGalaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsPhysicsAstrophysicsLine (geometry)Spectral lineHydrogen lineSigmaGalaxyAstronomyGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present new L-band (1–2 GHz) observations of the nearby spiral galaxy M33 with 80 pc resolution obtained with the Karl G. Jansky Very Large Array. The H i observations, combined with H i measurements from the Green Bank Telescope, improve the spectral resolution and sensitivity (2.8 K rms noise in a 0.2 |${\rm km\, s^{-1}}$| channel) compared to previous observations. We find individual profiles are usually non-Gaussian, harbouring line wings, multiple components, and asymmetries. Given this spectral complexity, we quantify the motions in the atomic interstellar medium through moment analysis of the spectra and fits to aligned, stacked profiles. The measured value of the H i line width depends strongly on the method used, with the velocity stacked profiles aligned to the peak velocity giving the minimum value of σ = 7 |${\rm km\, s^{-1}}$| and all other methods giving higher values (σ ∼ 10 |${\rm km\, s^{-1}}$|⁠). All measurements of the line width show a shallow radial trend, with σ decreasing by ∼2 |${\rm km\, s^{-1}}$| from Rgal = 0 to Rgal = 8 kpc. We consider a number of energy sources that might maintain the line width against turbulent dissipation, but no single source is adequate. We find excess emission relative to a Gaussian in the stacked profile line wings, ranging from 9 per cent to 26 per cent depending on how the spectra are aligned. By splitting the line wings into symmetric and asymmetric components, we find that the lagging rotational disc accounts for one-third of the line wing flux. We also find emission far from the rotation-axis of the galaxy in multiple discrete H i clouds, including a filament with a projected length of ∼8 kpc.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.025

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.202
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations58
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society→Same topicGalaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena→French-language works237,207→