MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2810546111 · doi:10.1002/dac.3555

Relax online resource allocation algorithms for D2D communication

2018· article· en· W2810546111 on OpenAlexaff
Md Sakhawat Hossen, Md Yeakub Hassan, Faisal Hussain, Salimur Choudhury, Muhammad Mahbub Alam

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Communication Systems · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced MIMO Systems Optimization
Canadian institutionsLakehead University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceAlgorithmOnline algorithmCellular networkBipartite graphMatching (statistics)Blossom algorithmScheduling (production processes)Mathematical optimizationTheoretical computer scienceComputer networkMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Summary Maximizing the system sumrate by sharing the resource blocks among the cellular user equipments and the D2D (device to device) pairs while maintaining the quality of service is an important research question in a D2D communication underlaying cellular networks. The problem can be optimally solved in offline by using the weighted bipartite matching algorithm. However, in long‐term evolution and beyond (4G and 5G) systems, scheduling algorithms should be very efficient where the optimal algorithm is quite complex to implement. Hence, a low complexity algorithm that returns almost the optimal solution can be an alternative to this research problem. In this paper, we propose 2 less complex stable matching–based relax online algorithms those exhibit very close to the optimal solution. Our proposed algorithms deal with fixed number of cellular user equipments and a variable number of D2D pairs those arrive in the system online. Unlike online matching algorithms, we consider that an assignment can be revoked if it improves the objective function (total system sumrate). However, we want to minimize the number of revocation (ie, the number of changes in the assignments) as a large number of changes can be expensive for the networks too. We consider various offline algorithms proposed for the same research problem as relaxed online algorithms. Through extensive simulations, we find that our proposed algorithms outperform all of the algorithms in terms of the number of changes in assignment between 2 successive allocations while maintaining the total system sumrate very close to the optimal algorithm.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.019

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.312
Teacher spread0.283 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Communication SystemsSame topicAdvanced MIMO Systems OptimizationFrench-language works237,207