MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2810562590 · doi:10.1080/08865655.2017.1315609

Borders Near and Far: The Economic, Geographic and Regulatory Contexts for Trade and Border-Related Issues in Landlocked Alberta

2018· article· en· W2810562590 on OpenAlexafffundvenueabout
Geoffrey Hale

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Borderlands Studies · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Policy and Governance
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Lethbridge
FundersSocial Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada
KeywordsLandlocked countryCommodityInternational tradeForeign direct investmentInvestment (military)Production (economics)BusinessBilateral tradeInternational economicsEconomic geographyEconomicsPoliticsGeographyChinaMarket economyPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The landlocked Canadian province of Alberta is an anomaly in the study of Canadian borders and borderlands. Major export sectors are increasingly dependent on negotiated access to US and other foreign markets, and sometimes to conditions imposed by other provinces. Major Alberta-based firms and sectors have extensive international operations dependent on efficient borders and predictable rules-based regulatory systems at and beyond borders. Regulatory regimes governing border and trans-border regions vary widely across sectors. Key factors affecting cross-border trade and travel include dispersed markets and related trade corridors, highly segmented production and distribution processes across and within sectors, highly variable commodity price cycles, risks of significant political shocks and ongoing contestation affecting interprovincial and trans-border trade, investment and travel.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.601
Threshold uncertainty score0.978

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.319
Teacher spread0.305 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2018
Admission routes4
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Borderlands StudiesSame topicCanadian Policy and GovernanceFrench-language works237,207