MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2810578046 · doi:10.5194/hess-2018-236

Analysis of the effects of biases in ESP forecasts on electricityproduction in hydropower reservoir management

2018· article· en· W2810578046 on OpenAlexaffabout
Richard Arsenault, Pascal Côté

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicWater resources management and optimization
Canadian institutionsÉcole de Technologie SupérieureRio Tinto (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStreamflowHydropowerInflowComputer scienceHydroelectricityEnvironmental scienceTime horizonSpillageWeather Research and Forecasting ModelMeteorologyMathematical optimizationEngineeringMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract. This paper presents an analysis of the effects of biased Extended Streamflow Prediction (ESP) forecasts on three deterministic optimization techniques implemented in a simulated operational context with a rolling horizon testbed for managing a cascade of hydroelectric reservoirs and generating stations in Québec, Canada. The observed weather data was fed to the hydrological model and the synthetic streamflow thus generated was considered as a proxy for the observed inflow. A traditional, climatology-based ESP forecast approach was used to generate ensemble streamflow scenarios, which were used by three reservoir management optimization approaches. Both positive and negative biases were then forced into the ensembles by multiplying the streamflow values by constant factors. The optimization method’s response to those biases was measured through the evaluation of the average annual energy generation in a forward-rolling simulation test-bed in which the entire system is precisely and accurately modeled. The ensemble climate data forecasts, the hydrological modeling and ESP forecast generation, optimization model and decision-making process are all integrated, as is the simulation model that updates reservoir levels and computes generation at each time step. The study focused on one hydropower system both with and without minimum base load constraints. This study finds that the tested deterministic optimization algorithms lack the capacity to compensate for uncertainty in future inflows and therefore increases the odds of forced spillage by attempting to maximize short-term profit by keeping a higher net head. It is shown that for this particular system, an increase in ESP forecast inflows of approximately 5 % allows managing the reservoirs at optimal levels and producing the most energy on average, effectively negating the deterministic model's tendency to underestimate the risk of spilling. Finally, it is shown that implementing minimum load constraints serves as a de facto control on deterministic bias by forcing the system to draw more water from the reservoirs than what the models consider optimal trajectories.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.196
Threshold uncertainty score0.180

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.204
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicWater resources management and optimizationFrench-language works237,207