Determination of Free 25(OH)D Concentrations and Their Relationships to Total 25(OH)D in Multiple Clinical Populations
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Context: The optimal measure of vitamin D status is unknown. Objective: To directly measure circulating free 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] concentrations and relationships to total 25(OH)D in a clinically diverse sample of humans. Design: Cross-sectional analysis. Setting: Seven academic sites. Patients: A total of 1661 adults: healthy (n = 279), prediabetic (n = 479), outpatients (n = 714), cirrhotic (n = 90), pregnant (n = 20), nursing home resident (n = 79). Interventions: Merge research data on circulating free 25(OH)D (directly-measured immunoassay), total 25(OH)D (liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry), D-binding protein [DBP; by radial (polyclonal) immunodiffusion assay], albumin, creatinine, intact parathyroid hormone, and DBP haplotype. Main outcome measures: Distribution of free 25(OH)D (ANOVA with Bonferroni correction for post hoc comparisons) and relationships between free and total 25(OH)D (mixed-effects modeling incorporating clinical condition, DBP haplotype with sex, race, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), body mass index (BMI), and other covariates). Results: Free 25(OH)D was 4.7 ± 1.8 pg/mL (mean ± SD) in healthy persons and 4.3 ± 1.9 pg/mL in outpatients, with levels of 0.5 to 8.1 pg/mL and 0.9 to 8.1 pg/mL encompassing 95% of healthy persons and outpatients, respectively. Free 25(OH)D was higher in patients with cirrhosis (7.1 ± 3.0 pg/mL; P < 0.0033) and nursing home residents (7.9 ± 2.1 pg/mL; P < 0.0033) than in other groups and differed between whites and blacks (P < 0.0033) and between DBP haplotypes (P < 0.0001). Mixed-effects modeling of relationships between free and total 25(OH)D identified clinical conditions (patients with cirrhosis > nursing home residents > patients with prediabetes > outpatients > pregnant women) and BMI (lesser effect) as covariates affecting relationships but not eGFR, sex, race, or DBP haplotype. Conclusions: Total 25(OH)D, health condition, race, and DBP haplotype affected free 25(OH)D, but only health conditions and BMI affected relationships between total and free 25(OH)D. Clinical importance of free 25(OH)D needs to be established in studies assessing outcomes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".