An elliptical liquid inclusion in an infinite elastic plane
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Beyond recent related literature, which focused on spherical incompressible liquid inclusions, the present work studies an elliptical compressible liquid inclusion in an infinite elastic plane under static remote mechanical loading. Here, it is assumed that the change of pressure inside the liquid inclusion is linearly related to the change of inclusion volume with the bulk modulus of the liquid as the proportionality coefficient. Also, the role of the liquid surface tension on the solid–liquid interface is examined especially when the size of the liquid inclusion is comparable to or smaller than the elastocapillary length. Our results show that both the surface tension and the change of liquid pressure have a significant effect on reducing the stress concentration factor at the endpoints of an elliptical liquid inclusion. In addition, the pressure change inside the liquid inclusion is studied when a uniaxial remote stress is applied perpendicular or parallel to the major axis of the elliptical liquid inclusion. In particular, the effective plane-strain Young's modulus of a solid–liquid composite containing circular liquid inclusions predicted by the present model is linearly related to the volume fraction of the liquid inclusions, in reasonable agreement with existing experimental data.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it