An elliptical liquid inclusion in an infinite elastic plane
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Beyond recent related literature, which focused on spherical incompressible liquid inclusions, the present work studies an elliptical compressible liquid inclusion in an infinite elastic plane under static remote mechanical loading. Here, it is assumed that the change of pressure inside the liquid inclusion is linearly related to the change of inclusion volume with the bulk modulus of the liquid as the proportionality coefficient. Also, the role of the liquid surface tension on the solid–liquid interface is examined especially when the size of the liquid inclusion is comparable to or smaller than the elastocapillary length. Our results show that both the surface tension and the change of liquid pressure have a significant effect on reducing the stress concentration factor at the endpoints of an elliptical liquid inclusion. In addition, the pressure change inside the liquid inclusion is studied when a uniaxial remote stress is applied perpendicular or parallel to the major axis of the elliptical liquid inclusion. In particular, the effective plane-strain Young's modulus of a solid–liquid composite containing circular liquid inclusions predicted by the present model is linearly related to the volume fraction of the liquid inclusions, in reasonable agreement with existing experimental data.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".