Inmersión, redes sociales y narrativa transmedia: la modalidad de recepción inclusiva
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
En el presente artículo, sostengo que las redes sociales se convierten en el sitio principal de un nuevo conjunto de relaciones entre la ficción y la realidad en la narración transmedia al permitir la interacción entre los personajes (en el mundo ficticio) y los interactores (en el mundo real). Estas relaciones subyacen a un nuevo modo de recepción, que propongo llamar el modo de recepción inclusivo. A diferencia del modo de recepción “inmersivo”, cuyo objetivo final es sustituir una realidad por otra alterando la realidad del interactor y sumergiéndolos en un mundo ficticio completamente diferente, el objetivo principal del modo de recepción “inclusivo” es posibilitar el coexistencia simultánea de dos mundos (los de la realidad cotidiana del interactor y del mundo ficticio que consumen) y conectarlos utilizando las redes sociales como interfaz.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it