MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2810638262 · doi:10.1017/cjn.2018.120

P.018 Forced normalization after vagal nerve stimulation in a case of intractable Lennox-Gastaut syndrome

2018· article· en· W2810638262 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Alyssa Denton, A Vitali, Karen Waterhouse, JF Tellez-Zenteno

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences Neurologiques · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicVagus Nerve Stimulation Research
Canadian institutionsSaskatoon Medical Imaging
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVagus nerve stimulationEpilepsyAnesthesiaMedicinePsychosisPsychologyPediatricsPsychiatryVagus nerveStimulationNeuroscience

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Forced normalization is the development of psychiatric symptoms in a patient experiencing remission of intractable seizures. The mechanism of this phenomenon is unknown. We present a complex case of Lennox Gastaut syndrome that experiences forced normalization after vagus nerve stimulation (VNS). Methods: This case details a 31-year-old male with seizures since early childhood. The patient has intractable epilepsy and failed AEDs, VNS, and a partial callosotomy. Results: The patient was in remission from 2-12 years old, when seizures returned at a frequency of 2-5 per day. He has multiple types of seizures including drop attacks, absences, and tonic-clonic seizures. Patient experienced status epilepticus multiple times. Twelve AEDs were failed before VNS was started in 2010, which helped curb the severity of seizures and the potential for clusters. Forced normalization developed over the course of treatment with VNS. The patient behavior was characterized by aggression, paranoia, and hallucinations. VNS was turned off late in 2010 and then re-started in January of 2011. Patient proceeded to cycle between several days of seizures without psychiatric symptoms and several days of psychosis without seizures. Conclusions: Vagus nerve stimulation gave way to forced normalization, characterized here as aggressive behaviour and psychosis. Forced normalization is seen commonly after epilepsy surgery, but rarely following VNS.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.438
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0020.008
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.051
GPT teacher head0.318
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences NeurologiquesSame topicVagus Nerve Stimulation ResearchFrench-language works237,207