MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2810684542 · doi:10.3917/rdm.051.0217

Les passions orphelines : l’inversion morale selon Michael Polanyi

2018· article· fr· W2810684542 on OpenAlex
Jean‐Baptiste Lamarche

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue du MAUSS · 2018
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicPolitical Theory and Influence
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPassionsPhilosophyHumanitiesEpistemology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

La théorie de l’inversion morale proposée par Michael Polanyi et Charles Taylor offre une sorte d’inversion de l’herméneutique du soupçon. Selon celle-ci, le langage de l’action est plus noble que l’action elle-même. En revanche, Polanyi, tout comme Tocqueville, soutient que, dans la société moderne, où les passions morales n’ont plus autant droit de cité (en raison de l’emprise d’un regard réductionniste sur l’être humain), l’action est parfois plus noble que le langage utilisé pour la décrire. Pour parvenir à affirmer nos motivations morales, nous sommes enclins à recourir aux cadres conceptuels (comme le marxisme ou la psychanalyse) qui, sous couvert de développer une critique radicale de la morale, expriment des aspirations morales d’une manière indirecte et voilée.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.927
Threshold uncertainty score0.996

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.317
Teacher spread0.274 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it