Language network measures at rest indicate individual differences in naming decline after anterior temporal lobe resection
Bibliographic record
Abstract
While anterior temporal lobe (ATL) resection is an effective treatment for temporal lobe epilepsy, surgery on the dominant hemisphere is associated with variable decline in confrontation naming. Accurate prediction of naming impairment is critical to inform clinical decision making, and while there has been some degree of success using task-based functional MRI (fMRI) paradigms, there remains a growing interest in the predictive utility of resting-state connectivity as it allows for relatively shorter scans with low task demands. Our objective was to assess the relationship between measures of preoperative resting-state connectivity and postoperative naming change in patients following left ATL resection. We compared the resting language network connectivity of each patient to a normative healthy control template using a novel measure called "matrix similarity," and found that patients with more abnormal global language-network connectivity-particularly of regions spared from surgery-showed greater postoperative naming decline than those with normative patterns of connectivity. When we interrogated the degree centrality of to-be-resected regions in a more targeted approach of the pathological temporal lobe, we found that greater functional integration of those regions with the rest of the language network at rest was related to greater decline in naming following surgery. Finally, we found that matrix similarity was a better predictor of postoperative outcome than degree within to-be-resected regions, network clustering, modularity, and language task fMRI laterality. We provide some of the first evidence that using this novel measure, a relatively short preoperative resting scan can be exploited to inform naming ability following ATL resection.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".