Endovascular retrieval of ruptured and dislocated vascular catheter
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ENWEndNote BIBJabRef, Mendeley RISPapers, Reference Manager, RefWorks, Zotero AMA Chyrchel M, Gębska M, Zieliński P, Dziewierz A, Chyrchel B. Endovascular retrieval of ruptured and dislocated vascular catheter. Advances in Interventional Cardiology/Postępy w Kardiologii Interwencyjnej. 2018;14(2):216-217. doi:10.5114/aic.2018.76422. APA Chyrchel, M., Gębska, M., Zieliński, P., Dziewierz, A., & Chyrchel, B. (2018). Endovascular retrieval of ruptured and dislocated vascular catheter. Advances in Interventional Cardiology/Postępy w Kardiologii Interwencyjnej, 14(2), 216-217. https://doi.org/10.5114/aic.2018.76422 Chicago Chyrchel, Michał, Monika Gębska, Przemysław Zieliński, Artur Dziewierz, and Bernadeta Chyrchel. 2018. "Endovascular retrieval of ruptured and dislocated vascular catheter". Advances in Interventional Cardiology/Postępy w Kardiologii Interwencyjnej 14 (2): 216-217. doi:10.5114/aic.2018.76422. Harvard Chyrchel, M., Gębska, M., Zieliński, P., Dziewierz, A., and Chyrchel, B. (2018). Endovascular retrieval of ruptured and dislocated vascular catheter. Advances in Interventional Cardiology/Postępy w Kardiologii Interwencyjnej, 14(2), pp.216-217. https://doi.org/10.5114/aic.2018.76422 MLA Chyrchel, Michał et al. "Endovascular retrieval of ruptured and dislocated vascular catheter." Advances in Interventional Cardiology/Postępy w Kardiologii Interwencyjnej, vol. 14, no. 2, 2018, pp. 216-217. doi:10.5114/aic.2018.76422. Vancouver Chyrchel M, Gębska M, Zieliński P, Dziewierz A, Chyrchel B. Endovascular retrieval of ruptured and dislocated vascular catheter. Advances in Interventional Cardiology/Postępy w Kardiologii Interwencyjnej. 2018;14(2):216-217. doi:10.5114/aic.2018.76422.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".