MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2810783067 · doi:10.1016/j.vgie.2018.06.001

Microforceps-assisted diagnosis of a cystic GI stromal tumor lesion

2018· article· en· W2810783067 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueVideoGIE · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGastrointestinal Tumor Research and Treatment
Canadian institutionsVancouver General Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineLesionCystCarcinoembryonic antigenHigh-power fieldGiSTPathologyStromal tumorBiopsyEndoscopic ultrasoundRadiologyStromal cellImmunohistochemistryCancerInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A 67-year-old woman was found to have an incidental 7-cm cystic lesion in close proximity to the tail of the pancreas (Fig. 1A). The cyst was discovered when a CT scan was ordered to identify spinal pathologic changes. The initial EUS with FNA drained 400 mL of fluid (Fig. 1B). The fluid amylase was 51 U/L, and the carcinoembryonic antigen was 3.5 ng/mL. Cytologic analysis did not demonstrate any neoplasia.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.182
Threshold uncertainty score0.494

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.068
GPT teacher head0.352
Teacher spread0.284 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it