MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2810809414 · doi:10.1016/j.nicl.2018.06.029

Disruption, emergence and lateralization of brain network hubs in mesial temporal lobe epilepsy

2018· article· en· W2810809414 on OpenAlexafffund
Kangjoo Lee, Hui Ming Khoo, Jean‐Marc Lina, François Dubeau, Jean Gotman, Christophe Grova

Bibliographic record

VenueNeuroImage Clinical · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicFunctional Brain Connectivity Studies
Canadian institutionsConcordia UniversityÉcole de Technologie SupérieureUniversité de MontréalMcGill UniversityMontreal Neurological Institute and Hospital
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchUehara Memorial Foundation
KeywordsLateralization of brain functionNeuroscienceEpilepsyDefault mode networkTemporal lobePsychologyConnectomeComputer scienceFunctional magnetic resonance imagingFunctional connectivity

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

-hubness. We quantified the disruption and emergence of connector hubs in individual epileptic subjects and assessed the lateralization of networks involving connector hubs. In mTLE, we found pathological disruptions of normal connector hubs in the mTL and within the default mode network. Right mTLE had remarkably higher emergence of new connector hubs in the mTL than left mTLE. Different patterns of lateralization of the salience network involving the abnormal hippocampus were found in right versus left mTLE. The temporal, cerebellar, default mode, subcortical and motor networks also contributed to the lateralization of hippocampal networks. We finally observed an asymmetrical connector hub reorganization and overall regularization of epilepsy-related resting state networks in mTLE, characterized by the disruption of distant connections and the emergence of local connections.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.019
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.027
Threshold uncertainty score0.989

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.019
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.086
GPT teacher head0.377
Teacher spread0.292 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations64
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeuroImage ClinicalSame topicFunctional Brain Connectivity StudiesFrench-language works237,207