Disruption, emergence and lateralization of brain network hubs in mesial temporal lobe epilepsy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Hubs of brain networks are brain regions exhibiting denser connections than others, promoting long-range communication. Studies suggested the reorganization of hubs in epilepsy. The patterns of connector hub abnormalities specific to mesial temporal lobe epilepsy (mTLE) are unclear. We wish to quantify connector hub abnormalities in mTLE and identify epilepsy-related resting state networks involving abnormal connector hubs. A recently developed sparsity-based analysis of reliable k -hubness (SPARK) allowed us to address this question by using resting state functional MRI in 20 mTLE patients and 17 healthy controls. Handling the multicollinearity of functional networks, SPARK measures a new metric of hubness by counting the number ( k ) of networks involved in each voxel, and identifies which networks are actually associated to each connector hub. This measure provides new information about the network architecture involving connector hubs and a realistic range of k -hubness. We quantified the disruption and emergence of connector hubs in individual epileptic subjects and assessed the lateralization of networks involving connector hubs. In mTLE, we found pathological disruptions of normal connector hubs in the mTL and within the default mode network. Right mTLE had remarkably higher emergence of new connector hubs in the mTL than left mTLE. Different patterns of lateralization of the salience network involving the abnormal hippocampus were found in right versus left mTLE. The temporal, cerebellar, default mode, subcortical and motor networks also contributed to the lateralization of hippocampal networks. We finally observed an asymmetrical connector hub reorganization and overall regularization of epilepsy-related resting state networks in mTLE, characterized by the disruption of distant connections and the emergence of local connections.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".