An elusive thermal [2 + 2] cycloaddition driven by visible light photocatalysis: tapping into strain to access <i>C</i>2-symmetric tricyclic rings
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A mild and operationally simple methodology is reported for the synthesis of cyclobutane rings imbedded within a C2-symmetric tricyclic framework. The method uses visible light and an iridium-based photocatalyst to drive the oft-stated "forbidden" thermal [2 + 2] cycloaddition of cycloheptenes and analogs. Importantly, it generates cyclobutane with four new stereocenters with excellent stereoselectivity, and perfect regioselectivity. The reaction is propelled forward when the photocatalyst absorbs a visible light photon, which transfers this energy to the cycloheptene. Key to success is, upon excitation to the triplet via sensitization from the photocatalyst, the double bond isomerizes to give the transient, highly strained, trans-cycloheptene. The trans-cycloheptene undergoes a strain relieving thermal, intermolecular [π2s + π2a] cycloaddition with another cis-cycloheptene. X-ray analysis reveals that the major product is the head-to-head, C2-symmetric all trans-cyclobutane. Additionally, a dramatic display structural complexity enhancement is observed with the use of chiral cycloheptenols possessing one stereocenter, which results in the formation of cyclobutanes with six contiguous stereocenters with good to excellent diastereocontrol, and can be used to isolate single stereoisomers of stereochemically complex cyclobutanes in good yield.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".