MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2810835403

Tesla yet to nail down lithium supply

2016· article· en· W2810835403 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Myles McCormick

Bibliographic record

VenueIndustrial Minerals · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicState Capitalism and Financial Governance
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLithium (medication)Investment (military)FinanceBusinessEngineeringPolitical scienceLawPsychology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Tesla Inc. is likely to be forced into paying high market prices for the lithium needed to prodcue lithium-ion (Li-ion) batteries at its Reno, Nevada-based Gigafactory in the US for the facility's initial years of operation, the UK's Financial Times (FT) has reported. The current strategy seems to be no direct investment but leveraging the Tesla name by signing 'contingent' contracts at unachievably low prices with junior mining companies who have never produced lithium chemicals, Joe Lowry, founder of consultancy, Global Lithium, told the FT. In August, Tesla signed its first lithium supply deal with UK and Canada-listed Bacanora Minerals Ltd, which is in the process of developing the Sonora project in Mexico. The announcement caused uproar among Nevada politicians who had hoped Tesla would use a local supplier, given the $1.3bn in tax breaks it had been provided to locate the plant in Reno.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.066
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIndustrial MineralsSame topicState Capitalism and Financial GovernanceFrench-language works237,207