Scénarios culturels du cinéma québécois en matière de sexualité
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cette etude vise a decrire les scenarios culturels des films quebecois Les 3 p’tits cochons et Romeo et Juliette en matiere de sexualite. La precocite des relations sexuelles chez les adolescents represente un probleme majeur de sante publique et les medias sont souvent pointes du doigt lorsque vient le temps de trouver le responsable des comportements sexuels a risque de ces jeunes. Les medias sont consideres comme etant un important agent de socialisation pour les adolescents et une source privilegiee d’information concernant la sexualite. La perspective des scripts sexuels de Gagnon et Simon (1973) nous permet de faire ressortir les modeles de comportement sexuel qui sont recurrents d’un film a l’autre et qui sont susceptibles d’etre imites par les adolescents qui auront visionne ces films. A l’aide d’une analyse de contenu qualitative, nous en avons identifie quatre dans notre corpus de films, plus un autre qui aborde directement la question du comportement sexuel securitaire et des consequences liees a une sexualite non-protegee.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.009 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".