MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2810926963 · doi:10.1109/lsp.2018.2849683

Accurate Analytical BER Performance for ZF Receivers Under Imperfect Channel in Low-SNR Region for Large Receiving Antennas

2018· article· en· W2810926963 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Signal Processing Letters · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced MIMO Systems Optimization
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsMIMOChannel (broadcasting)Bit error rateComputer scienceSignal-to-noise ratio (imaging)Maximal-ratio combiningAlgorithmImperfectElectronic engineeringMathematicsTelecommunicationsControl theory (sociology)FadingEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Most analytical work for zero-forcing (ZF) receivers are conducted for small-scale multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO) systems in large signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) region and under small channel estimation error conditions. Using large receiving antennas, systems are expected to work in the low-SNR region and under large channel estimation error. In these conditions, we observe an obvious mismatch between the existing analytical results and the simulations. In this letter, we derive an accurate analytical bit error rate (BER) expression for ZF receivers under imperfect channel estimation. We show that our results match nicely with the simulations in small-scale and large-scale MIMO systems, even when large channel estimation error presents.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.821
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it