MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2811058419 · doi:10.1080/01443615.2018.1444409

Diagnosing causes of headache within the postpartum period

2018· article· en· W2811058419 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Emma Stanhope, Lynsey Foulds, Gamal Sayed, Ute Goldmann

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNeurological Complications and Syndromes
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePostpartum periodHeadachesEtiologyPregnancyPediatricsSurgeryPsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Headache is one of the most common symptoms following delivery and the underlying cause may be benign or life threatening. Identification of the cause of headache in the postpartum period can be challenging and relies on a comprehensive history and thorough examination, with particular focus on the presence or absence of neurological signs, which may suggest a more serious diagnosis (Nelson-Piercy 2010 Nelson-Piercy C. 2010. Handbook of Obstetric Medicine. 4th ed. London: Informa Healthcare [cited 2016 Dec 5]. [Crossref] , [Google Scholar]). However, through clinical experience and research, we have noted that post-partum headache is significantly under-recognised and treated (Goldszmidt et al. 2005 Goldszmidt E, Kern R, Chaput A, Macarthur A. 2005. The incidence and etiology of postpartum headaches: a prospective cohort study. Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal Canadien D’anesthésie 52:971–977. Available from: http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF03022061 [cited 2016 Dec 15].[Crossref], [PubMed], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]).Aims: To ensure a standardised approach to the management of patients presenting with postpartum headache, we sought to introduce a diagnostic tool for postpartum headache.Methods: This was a literature review combined with a postpartum headache case example that occurred within our institution in 2015. Risk factors and potential clinical failures from the case were noted and compared to the literature.Results: Our case is a 28-year-old woman who developed a postpartum headache following spontaneous vaginal delivery. Of note, the patient had an epidural inserted in labour for analgesia. Initially, systemic and neurological examinations were normal and the patient was discharged home with simple analgesics and a diagnosis of tension-type headache. She represented with worsening headache, pyrexia and signs of meningism. Lumbar puncture confirmed a diagnosis of bacterial meningitis caused by Haemophilus influenzae. She was treated with IV ceftriaxone and discharged home without any long-term sequelae.In an attempt to improve recognition of post-partum headache, especially rare causes such as meningitis, NHS Tayside has chosen to adopt the PARTUM mneumonic (Lim et al. 2014 Lim S, Evangelou N, Jürgens S. 2014. Postpartum headache: diagnostic considerations. Practical Neurology 14:92–99. Available from: http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/822697_1 [cited 2017 Jan 4].[Crossref], [PubMed] , [Google Scholar]).Pressure (blood pressure for pre-eclampsia/eclampsia)Anaesthetic (post-dural puncture headache)Reversible (vasoconstriction syndrome)Thrombosis (cerebral venous sinus thrombosis, ischaemic stroke)Use your brain (there are so many other causes of headache)Migraine (Lim et al. 2014 Lim S, Evangelou N, Jürgens S. 2014. Postpartum headache: diagnostic considerations. Practical Neurology 14:92–99. Available from: http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/822697_1 [cited 2017 Jan 4].[Crossref], [PubMed] , [Google Scholar]).PARTUM was first devised in 2014 as part of a research paper published by the Journal Practical Neurology (Lim et al. 2014 Lim S, Evangelou N, Jürgens S. 2014. Postpartum headache: diagnostic considerations. Practical Neurology 14:92–99. Available from: http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/822697_1 [cited 2017 Jan 4].[Crossref], [PubMed] , [Google Scholar]). The aim of the mnemonic is to allow the treating physician a basic list of postpartum headache causes to use as a working diagnosis (Lim et al. 2014 Lim S, Evangelou N, Jürgens S. 2014. Postpartum headache: diagnostic considerations. Practical Neurology 14:92–99. Available from: http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/822697_1 [cited 2017 Jan 4].[Crossref], [PubMed] , [Google Scholar]).Conclusions: Research has shown that many postpartum headaches go undiagnosed and as a result are poorly treated, often returning following discharge from secondary care (Nelson-Piercy 2010 Nelson-Piercy C. 2010. Handbook of Obstetric Medicine. 4th ed. London: Informa Healthcare [cited 2016 Dec 5]. [Crossref] , [Google Scholar]). The hope is that the introduction of this adjuvant will allow clinicians to identify the cause of postpartum headaches earlier and will allow life threatening diagnoses to be quickly excluded.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.040
Threshold uncertainty score0.404

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.296
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Obstetrics and GynaecologySame topicNeurological Complications and SyndromesFrench-language works237,207