A user‐centric cooperative edge caching scheme for minimizing delay in 5G content delivery networks
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract This paper investigates the problem of user‐centric cooperative edge caching in content delivery networks to leverage service provisioning at the network edge and to improve the quality of experience by minimizing the end‐to‐end delay. By taking advantage of the major characteristics in fifth‐generation networks, users can access contents not only from the nearest small base station (SBS) but also from other SBSs in the vicinity that have the requested precached contents. In the proposed scheme, a user‐centric delivery approach is considered in such a way that the base station can respond to the user request as long as it has enough resources. To this end, a caching algorithm is introduced whereby a group of SBSs cooperatively share storage and decide on the caching policy together aiming to cache as much contents as possible under the capacity constraint. Moreover, a modified matching theory is used for content delivery taking the bandwidth requirements into account. Simulation results show that the proposed scheme can achieve 99.5% local serve ratio when the SBS has a caching capacity of 40% the overall file size, and 20 available communication channels for content distribution.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".