Slope-shelf faunal link and unreported diversity off Nova Scotia: Evidence from polychaete data
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Deep-water sedimentary habitats off Nova Scotia have only rarely been explored. The topographically and oceanographically complex shelf of Nova Scotia harbours two interesting topographic features, Emerald Basin, a sedimentary habitat reaching greater depths (max of 270 m) than the surrounding shelf and the Gully, the largest canyon in NW Atlantic. Emerald Basin is exposed to upwellings of slope water and harbours predominantly deep-sea hexactinellid sponges. Such distributional pattern resembles “deep-water emergence”. In this study an abundant benthic group, the polychaetes, were selected to test for such deep-water faunal link. Qualitative boxcores were collected from Emerald Basin (180 m depth, N = 5) and the adjacent Gully Canyon (1600 m, N = 3). At species level, there was no overlap in distribution between Emerald Basin (N = 73, S=29) and Gully Canyon (N = 351, S = 60) fauna based on morphological assessment of all specimens and molecular analysis (COI and 16S markers) of selected morphotypes. In an alternative approach, Multivariate analysis (nMDS, Cluster Analysis) of incidence data for polychaete genera (N = 179) from 24 Atlantic sites (5–1600 m) was carried out. These results showed a greater similarity of Emerald Basin polychaetes to bathyal sites (400–1000 m), particularly the 680 m site off Nova Scotia rather than shelf sites (5–80 m), including those on the Nova Scotia shelf. Thus, at 1600 m, the Gully Canyon samples were likely “too deep” for our comparative purposes and depths of < 1000 m should be targeted in the future. Our data also provide the first published assessment of polychaete diversity from the Gully Canyon, suggesting the presence of a diverse assemblage (S = 60). Unusually for a deep-sea site, the Gully Canyon polychaetes are mostly known taxa with wider distribution across bathyal NW Atlantic. Additionally, our molecular data provide an interesting insights into the distribution of several polychaete species commonly found in deep-sea (e.g Aurospio dibranchiata Maciolek, 1981; Ophelina abranchiata Støp-Bowitz, 1948) suggesting wide geographical distribution for some but revealing species complexes for others.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".