Sincretismos morfológicos nas construções reflexivas e anticausativas em kadiwéu
Bibliographic record
Abstract
RESUMO: O presente trabalho investiga o estatuto dos morfemas d:- e n- na língua indígena brasileira kadiwéu. Os morfemas co-ocorrem em construções reflexivas e anticausativas, apesar de estarem, de acordo com a literatura (Sandalo 1997, 2015) associados a diferentes fenômenos e ocorrerem independentemente: o morfema n- é caracterizado como marca de construção antipassiva e o morfema d:- costuma ocorrer quando há presença de argumentos internos em posição pré-verbal. Baseando a análise nos pressupostos teóricos da Morfologia Distribuída e na proposta de análise transitiva de reflexivos de Alboiu, Barrie e Frigeni (2004), abordo cada um dos contextos de ocorrência dos morfemas, dando especial ênfase à sua co-ocorrência em construções anticausativas e reflexivas. O morfema n- é, então, analisado de forma comparável à marca passiva de Baker, Johnson e Roberts (1989) enquanto a ocorrência do morfema d:- é vista como o resultado de fissão no nó de concordância, fissão essa desencadeada pela concordância com argumento no caso absolutivo.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".