Role of Jordanian Universities in Facing Cultural Globalization
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study aimed at identifying the role of Jordanian universities in facing cultural globalization as perceived by students. Moreover, exploring if there are differences in the study sample concerning the role of Jordanian universities in facing cultural globalization due to the gender variable. In order to accomplish the objective of the study, a (31) items questionnaire was developed and its validity and reliability were confirmed. Then it was distributed to the study sample consisted of (200) undergraduate and postgraduate male and female students. The study demonstrated that there are no statistically significant differences, in the sample estimates, concerning the the role of Jordanian universities in facing cultural globalization due to the gender variable. The study recommended the need to formulate a strategy to deal with the developments, especially the modern technology, in addition to develop university curricula to entrench civilizational features that have an impact on the Arabic personality to face changes. Moreover, the urge for creating and refining media to be more experienced to contribute in building an Arab human who is conscious and able to be effective in confronting globalization dangers and protecting the nation’ identity and values. It also recommends entrenching the concept of cultural globalization and uncovers strengths and weaknesses areas by examining its advantages and disadvantages with an open-minded view that contributes to the enrichment of scientific heritage and be open to global cultures including their traditions and deep-rooted social values.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".