MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2811234456 · doi:10.7202/1045328ar

LES NOUVELLES SOCIÉTÉS À RESPONSABILITÉ LIMITÉE ET L’ASSURANCE DE RESPONSABILITÉ

2008· article· fr· W2811234456 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Marie-Josée TEIXEIRA

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue du notariat · 2008
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSocial Sciences and Governance
Canadian institutionsWorkplace Safety & Insurance Board
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical sciencePhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Depuis 2001, le Code des professions permet aux professionnels de se regrouper au sein d’une société en nom collectif à responsabilité limitée (s.e.n.c.r.l.) ou d’une société par actions (s.p.a.). Ce texte propose, dans un premier temps, de faire le point sur la responsabilité civile de la société et des professionnels ayant choisi l’une de ses formes juridiques pour exercer leur profession. Dans un deuxième temps, il y est question des principales protections d’assurance de responsabilité qui s’imposent à ces nouvelles sociétés de professionnels. L’auteur fait notamment état du fait que si l’assurance de responsabilité professionnelle obligatoire peut s’avérer suffisante pour protéger le public, elle suffit rarement à protéger le patrimoine des professionnels et de leurs sociétés.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.669
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.003
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.102
GPT teacher head0.363
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevue du notariatSame topicSocial Sciences and GovernanceFrench-language works237,207