MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2811247207 · doi:10.18192/rceh.v41i3.1735

La inclusión de la “legítima” como elemento desestabilizador de la nobleza en la Partida VI de Alfonso X

2017· article· es· W2811247207 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Yolanda Iglesias, David Navarro

Bibliographic record

VenueRevista Canadiense de Estudios Hispánicos · 2017
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicMedieval Iberian Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArtPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

La Partida VI del compendio legislativo castellano, las Siete Partidas de Alfonso X (1221-1284), describe el proceso de formulación e impugnación del testamento, la designación de herederos y el reparto obligatorio de un tercio de los bienes del progenitor entre todos los hijos por medio de la “legítima”. El objetivo de este artículo persigue demostrar de qué manera detrás de las intenciones de Alfonso X de abogar por el derecho individual hereditario a través de la “legítima”, se escondía otro propósito más personal: desestabilizar el poder económico de la nobleza que hacía peligrar las aspiraciones políticas del rey Sabio.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.032
Threshold uncertainty score0.064

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0060.011
Scholarly communication0.0050.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.289
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevista Canadiense de Estudios HispánicosSame topicMedieval Iberian StudiesFrench-language works237,207