MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2811385366 · doi:10.52155/ijpsat.v8.2.435

Factors Influence Tea Exports in North Sumatera Province

2018· article· en· W2811385366 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Jasmine Mardhina Qamarani Febri Caesar Putri, Tavi Supriana, Dan Rahmanta

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Progressive Sciences and Technologies · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicGlobal Trade and Competitiveness
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLiberian dollarPanel dataCommodityPopulationProduction (economics)Regression analysisUs dollarExchange rateAgricultural economicsGeographyFixed effects modelBusinessEconomicsDemographyStatisticsMathematicsEconometrics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

-  The province of North SumatEra has a leading commodity tea that shows the role in international trade activities through exports to several countries in the world. This study aims to analyze the effect of production, GDP of destination country, population of destination country, and exchange rate against dollar against tea export of North Sumatera. The type of this research is quantitative analysis using time series data from 2006 to 2015 from 10 export destination countries, namely Malaysia, United States, United Kingdom, Taiwan, Germany, Singapore, Pakistan, Emirates Arab, Canada and Russia. Data obtained from Central Bureau of Statistics (BPS) of North Sumatra Province and World Bank. Data analysis technique used is panel data regression with Fixed Effect Model (FEM) model. The results showed that production and GDP had positive and significant effect, the number of population had negative and significant effect, while the exchange rate did not significantly influence the tea export of North Sumatera.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.307

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Progressive Sciences and TechnologiesSame topicGlobal Trade and CompetitivenessFrench-language works237,207