P.096 Iatrogenic pseudoaneurysm of the MCA secondary to VP shunt insertion
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Ventriculoperitoneal (VP) shunting is a common treatment for hydrocephalus. Complications of VP shunt include infection, malfunction, and hemorrhage. Vascular complications such as pseudoaneurysm are rare, and usually involve the choroid plexus or branches of the external carotid artery. We present the case of a fusiform pseudoaneurysm of the middle cerebral artery arising due to VP shunt insertion. Methods: A 36-year-old female presented with a hypertensive cerebellar hemorrhage and hydrocephalus. This was treated with VP shunt placement with limited dural opening. Three weeks afterward there developed a diffuse intraventricular hemorrhage associated with hemorrhage at the cortical insertion site of the ventricular catheter. CT and catheter angiography revealed a fusiform pseudoaneurysm of the M4 segment of the MCA immediately adjacent to the ventricular catheter. Results: The VP shunt was removed, and the aneurysmal segment was coagulated and occluded. Delayed repeat VP shunt insertion was performed through the same entry point and trajectory via a larger dural opening. Conclusions: Pseudoaneurysm formation secondary to catheter insertion is a rare complication. To our knowledge, this is the second reported case of a cortical branch pseudoaneurysm in an adult. Careful consideration should be given to vascular anatomy when planning shunt insertions, and cruciate dural opening for local cortex visualization may help avoid this complication.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".