MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2811398549

Aspectos doutrinários e jurisprudenciais do contrato de faturização (factoring) no Brasil

2017· article· pt· W2811398549 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Alexandre Ferreira de Assumpção Alves, José Carlos Jordão Pinto Dias

Bibliographic record

VenueRevista Electrónica de Direito. RED · 2017
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicBrazilian Legal Issues
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFactoringDebtorHumanitiesPaymentPolitical scienceBusinessCreditorPhilosophyDebtFinance
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

EnglishThis paper presents aspects of factoring contract in Brazil. For this, a bibliographical and documentary research was done, using the deductive method. Factoring has considerable relevance for business and economy, and the parts of the contract must have full discretion as to the meaning and content of the clauses agreed. In this sense, the article deals with the essential characteristic of this contract in Brazil, that is, the exclusive responsibility of the factor, in case of lack of payment by the debtor. It is also discussed whether factoring is a business contract, as well as the possibility of assignment of credits from sales to consumers, the exclusivity of the contract, and the liability in case of non-payment of credits by the debtor. In addition, the paper deals with UNIDROIT Ottawa Convention of 1988, as well as Portuguese, Argentine and Mexican legislations, for, in the end, treating of the two Brazilian Projects of Business Code, which aims to regulate the matter, in order to observe the influences received by these projects. Finally, conclusions about the study will be presented portuguesO presente trabalho expoe aspectos do contrato de faturizacao (factoring) no Brasil. Para tanto, fez-se uso de pesquisa bibliografica e documental, valendo-se do metodo dedutivo. O contrato de factoring possui consideravel relevância para as sociedades empresarias e para a economia em geral, devendo as partes contratantes ter pleno discernimento do significado e conteudo das clausulas pactuadas. Nesse sentido, o estudo trata da caracteristica essencial do contrato no Brasil, qual seja, o faturizador nao possui direito de regresso em face do faturizado, em caso de inadimplemento por parte do devedor deste. Discute-se ainda se o factoring e contrato empresarial, bem como sobre a possibilidade de cessao de creditos provenientes de vendas a consumidores, sobre a exclusividade do faturizado em relacao ao faturizador, e sobre a responsabilidade do faturizado em caso de nao pagamento dos creditos pelo devedor. Alem disso, faz-se breve analise da Convencao de Ottawa da UNIDROIT de 1988, bem como das legislacoes portuguesa, argentina e mexicana, para, ao final, tratar dos dois Projetos de Codigo Comercial Brasileiro em tramitacao, que pretendem regulamentar a materia, de modo a observar quais as influencias recebidas por estes projetos. Ao final, serao apresentadas conclusoes sobre o estudo.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.077
Threshold uncertainty score0.153

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.004
Science and technology studies0.0040.007
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.346
Teacher spread0.320 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevista Electrónica de Direito. REDSame topicBrazilian Legal IssuesFrench-language works237,207