MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2811449496 · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01900

Corrigendum: Exposure to Parenting by Lying in Childhood: Associations with Negative Outcomes in Adulthood

2017· erratum· en· W2811449496 on OpenAlexafffund
Rachel Santos, Sarah Zanette, Shiu Man Kwok, Gail D. Heyman, Kang Lee

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Psychology · 2017
Typeerratum
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchSocial Sciences and Humanities Research Council of CanadaNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsPsychologyLyingDevelopmental psychologyLate childhoodMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

[This corrects the article on p. 1240 in vol. 8, PMID: 28824477.].

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.052
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.040
Threshold uncertainty score0.130

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.052
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0040.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.004
Bibliometrics0.0040.003
Science and technology studies0.0030.003
Scholarly communication0.0040.003
Open science0.0060.002
Research integrity0.0100.012
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0390.018

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.305
Teacher spread0.284 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontiers in Psychology→Same topicChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development→French-language works237,207→