MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2811468231 · doi:10.1111/emed.12276

Theoderic goes to the promised land: accidental propaganda in Jordanes's Gothic history?

2018· article· en· W2811468231 on OpenAlex
Ryan H. Wilkinson

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueEarly Medieval Europe · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicArchaeology and Historical Studies
Canadian institutionsAmbrose University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAllusionParallelsPraiseIntertextualityNarrativeRhetoricLiteratureAccidentalReading (process)HistoryPoint (geometry)ArtPhilosophyLinguistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Claims that Jordanes's Getica advanced Justinianic propaganda often point to its (alleged) critique of Theoderic the Ostrogoth. I argue instead that Jordanes intended a positive reading – but one point of praise was likely accidental. The Getica links Theoderic to the biblical figure of Moses, using narrative parallels between their careers and a specific biblical allusion. Although competent, Jordanes may never have recognized that Cassiodoran comparison, thanks to subtle divisions within the scriptural Latinity to which he and Cassiodorus belonged. Whatever his aims, Jordanes could not fully control Cassiodorus's rhetoric; the allusion's survival points to limits on conscious intertextuality in a diverse textual milieu.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.847
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it