MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2811512892 · doi:10.24133/cctespe.v13i1.755

Caracterización de la geoforma submarina Galera durante el proceso de extensión de plataforma continental ecuatoriana

2018· article· es· W2811512892 on OpenAlexaff
Nilton Sánchez, Lourdes Gaitán Muñoz, Karla Tituana, Isabel García, Carolina Rivas, Andrea Suárez

Bibliographic record

VenueCongreso de Ciencia y Tecnología ESPE · 2018
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Tectonic Studies in Latin America
Canadian institutionsContinental (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

El fondo marino presenta un sin número de rasgos submarinos que forman parte de la estructura de la corteza oceánica. Dichos rasgos se nombran en múltiples estudios y publicaciones de acuerdo al nombre otorgado por cada investigador. Sin embargo, a medida que se extiende el estudio del fondo marino es necesario asignarles un nombre mediante consideraciones técnicas que actualmente son estandarizadas por la Organización Hidrográfica Internacional y el Subcomité de los Nombres de las Formas del Relieve Submarino de la GEBCO para la temática de la toponimia submarina. En el presente trabajo, a través del modelado de la data batimétrica con la herramienta en Sistemas de Información Geográfica “ArcGis”, se encuentra la determinación de la existencia del monte submarino Galera, que fue aprobado por la SCUFN en 2017 por presentar una elevación de más de 1000 m (1027) con respecto al relieve circundante . El comportamiento geodinámico del monte Galera es de importancia regional porque se estima que en ~15000 años podría encontrarse en el límite de la fosa.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.136
Threshold uncertainty score0.270

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCongreso de Ciencia y Tecnología ESPESame topicGeological and Tectonic Studies in Latin AmericaFrench-language works237,207