MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2812087123 · doi:10.1177/1179069518786715

Testing the Protein Propagation Hypothesis of Parkinson Disease

2018· article· en· W2812087123 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Experimental Neuroscience · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicParkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
Canadian institutionsMontreal Neurological Institute and Hospital
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchW. Garfield Weston FoundationAlzheimer's AssociationMichael J. Fox Foundation for Parkinson's Research
KeywordsBrainstemNeuroscienceNeocortexConnectomeNeurologyDiseaseNeuroimagingAtrophyParkinson's diseasePathologyPrion proteinMedicineNeurodegenerationBiologyFunctional connectivity

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

One of the most exciting recent hypotheses in neurology is that most neurodegenerative diseases are caused by the neuron to neuron propagation of prion-like misfolded proteins. In Parkinson disease, the theory initially emerged from postmortem studies demonstrating a caudal-rostral progression of pathology from lower brainstem to neocortex. Later, animal studies showed that the hallmark protein of PD, α-synuclein, exhibited all the characteristics of a prion. Here, we describe our work using human neuroimaging to test the theory that PD pathology advances via a propagating process along the connectome. We found that the pattern and progression of brain atrophy follow neuronal connectivity, correlate with clinical features, and identify an epicenter in the brainstem.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.210
Threshold uncertainty score0.214

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.058
GPT teacher head0.300
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it