MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W281245344

Los inmigrantes latinoamericanos en España y en Estados Unidos: un análisis comparativo a partir del American Community Survey y la Encuesta Nacional de Inmigrantes de 2007.

2010· article· es· W281245344 on OpenAlex
Herbert S. Klein

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueHistoria y Política Ideas Procesos y Movimientos Sociales · 2010
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicImmigration and Intercultural Education
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsImmigrationLatin AmericansCensusAmerican Community SurveyQuarter (Canadian coin)Political scienceGeographyHumanitiesDemographySociologyPopulation
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The two nations which have been the recipients of the largest number of Latin American immigrants in the past quarter century, are the United States and Spain. The aim of this paper will be to compare the basic characteristics of these two groups of Latin American born immigrants as seen in two surveys of these populations carried out in 2007. The two primary sources for this analysis will be the Public Use Sample (IPUMS) of the United States Census Bureau’s, American Community Survey of 2007, and the special survey carried out by Spain’s Instituto Nacional de Estadistica, called the Encuesta Nacional de inmigrantes (ENI) 2007.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.011
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.440
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.011
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.005
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.352
Teacher spread0.325 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it