MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2815616658 · doi:10.1080/07060661.2018.1498807

Powdery mildew of California poppy caused by <i>Erysiphe eschscholziae</i> in Mexico

2018· article· en· W2815616658 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Plant Pathology · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPowdery Mildew Fungal Diseases
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPowdery mildewInternal transcribed spacerBiologyConidiumBotanyPoppyRibosomal DNAPhylogenetic treeGeneGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Severe infection by powdery mildew was observed on California poppy (Eschscholzia californica) plants in Texcoco, State of Mexico, during spring of 2014 to 2017. Symptoms included colonies of white to greyish mildew-like growth on the abaxial and adaxial surfaces of the leaves. The identification of the fungal species was performed by examination of morphological structures using light microscopy and scanning electron microscope (SEM), as well as sequence analysis of the 5ʹ-end of 28S rRNA gene and the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region of rDNA. Using the combination of morphological characterization and a phylogenetic analysis using Bayesian inference, the fungal agent was identified as Erysiphe eschscholziae. Pathogenicity tests were conducted on leaves of California poppy plants, and Koch’s postulates were fulfilled. This is the first report of E. eschscholziae causing powdery mildew on Eschscholzia californica in Mexico.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.500
Threshold uncertainty score0.894

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.194
Teacher spread0.182 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it