Les Idées sociopolitiques de Casanova sur la France du dix-huitième siècle — selon l’édition de 1880 de ses Mémoires
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Casanova est pratiquement esthète dans son appréciation des personnes, mais il les évalue aussi par rapport à leur abord, leur politesse sociale ou savoir vivre. Entre ses trois visites, la société change. Outre ses amis disparus, le voyageur n’a plus la joie de la conquête. Le Paris qu’il connaissait s’est transformé en une sorte de labyrinthe incompréhensible. Voulant aller de Saint-Eustache à la rue Saint-honoré, il s’égare dès qu’il ne trouve plus l’Hôtel de Soissons. Il n’a plus de succès au jeu, en amour ni en diplomatie. Louis XV dont les excès sexuels rappellent la débauche juvénile de Casanova est bien loin. Le vénitien conclut son observation en admirant le défunt Louis XV tandis que son jugement sur Louis XVI est féroce, parce que le voyageur attribue les maux à la faiblesse du dernier roi des Bourbons, qui aurait sauvé la France des horreurs révolutionnaires. La France n’est plus à l’image de sa seconde patrie.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.014 | 0.008 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.012 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".