MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2826707969 · doi:10.1212/wnl.0000000000005953

Isolated gait dysfunction due to intracranial hypotension

2018· article· en· W2826707969 on OpenAlexaff
Sanskriti Sasikumar, Karlo J. Lizárraga, Bhairavei Gnanamanogaran, Mathew Voisin, Philip Peng, Alfonso Fasano

Bibliographic record

VenueNeurology · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNeurosurgical Procedures and Complications
Canadian institutionsToronto Western HospitalKrembil FoundationUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOrthostatic vital signsGaitGait DisturbanceMedicinePhysical medicine and rehabilitationPresentation (obstetrics)Movement disordersAnesthesiaInternal medicineSurgeryDiseaseBlood pressure

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Gait disturbance is a rare presentation of intracranial hypotension (IH), and to date, has only been described in the presence of orthostatic headache and other movement disorders.1,2 It is characterized by unsteadiness, with gait start hesitation and inability to tandem.3–6 Among more than 250 cases of IH seen at our institution since 1997, we found only 2 cases that manifested as isolated gait dysfunction.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.812
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeurologySame topicNeurosurgical Procedures and ComplicationsFrench-language works237,207