MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W283067475

Frederic Sandeman De Mattos: Gentle Rogue and Talented Priest: Part One: Ritualist Controversy

2008· article· en· W283067475 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
David J. Langum

Bibliographic record

VenueAnglican and Episcopal history · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicAmerican Constitutional Law and Politics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBrotherPortugueseHistoryAbandonment (legal)ArtAncient historyLawPhilosophyPolitical science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Frederic Sandeman de Mattos was born a native of Jacksonville, Illinois, in 1860, the son of Antonio Joaquim de Mattos. His father, a Madeiran who had converted from Roman Catholicism to Presbyterianism, was an ordained minister and served a flock of exiled Portuguese in Jacksonville and Springfield, Illinois.1 Frederic and his brother, James P. de Mattos,2 absorbed the Scottish3 heritage of their mother, Isabella, and there is no evidence that either of them had any familiarity with their Portuguese tradition. De Mattos (always Frederic hereafter unless specifically indicated otherwise) probably suffered from a deep lack of selfesteem, perhaps derived from the short stature he shared with his brother, or perhaps from his mother's death when he was seven and his father's virtual abandonment of him when he was nine. Thereafter, Antonio provided for Frederic's support and educadon in France and Scotland, but Antonio lived in Portugal and Frederic grew up by himself. Later in life, until his personal reformation, Frederic often attempted to do bold deeds, even if based on misrepresentations, that compensated for his own inner feelings of inadequacy. He carried with him great sensitivity to any perceived criticism or slight. If any bubble broke for de Mattos he often reacted by flight or bizarre behavior. De Mattos attended the University of Glasgow for two years, then left when his finances ran out. During this time he rejected the Calvinism of his father and became an Anglican affiliated with the denomination's church wing. De Mattos felt called to the ministry, a move encouraged by his father, and enrolled in Wycliffe Seminary in Toronto, Ontario, which was at that time under the charge of de Mattos's cousin, the Rev. James P. Sheraton. Unfortunately for young de Mattos, Sheraton and his school embraced the evangelical and low church version of Anglicanism, and it was for this reason that de Mattos dropped out of Wycliffe after only a few months-the first of many precipitous moves he would make when he found things not just to his liking. De Mattos read for orders with a tutor and probably followed a course of study designed by a church clergyman, Bishop William E. McLaren of Chicago, who ordained de Mattos as a deacon in 1882. Following his ordination de Mattos served for the next two years as a deacon in two missions and one parish in the Chicago area. His church leanings, however, created controversy. The parish de Mattos served, Grace Church of Hinsdale, was low church; in December 1883 the vestry requested and a month later obtained the bishop's termination of de Mattos's appointment there. In all likelihood its congregation resented de Mattos's church ways. The division in churchmanship to which de Mattos fell prey in Hinsdale had its origins earlier in the nineteenth century. In the early decades of that century, churchmanship was not greatly controversial for the Episcopal Church because all churches were low by the present standards of the early twenty-first century. Almost all services focused on long sermons, and churches typically offered Holy Communion four or five times each year. Episcopal churches had no processions, no colored vestments, no acolytes, no candles except for lighting, and quite obviously no incense.3 However, there was already a division between an evangelical party and a church party, but not in the sense we think of this today. The church party emphasized baptismal regeneration, as distinct from the evangelicals' emphasis on adult renewal, but the church wing obtained its name because it held high the doctrine of apostolic succession.4 The Oxford Movement5 that began in England in the 1830s and became influential in the United States in the 1840s helped strengthen the church party in the Episcopal Church. This movement likewise emphasized apostolic succession, perhaps even more so, and claimed that only priests in the unbroken line of ordinations back to the apostles could validly administer the sacraments. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.038

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0140.021
Scholarly communication0.0050.004
Open science0.0010.006
Research integrity0.0040.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnglican and Episcopal historySame topicAmerican Constitutional Law and PoliticsFrench-language works237,207