MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2831720938 · doi:10.1075/rllt.13.11kam

Exploring sociolinguistic discontinuity in a minority variety of French

2018· book-chapter· en· W2831720938 on OpenAlex
Svetlana Kaminskaïa

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueRomance languages and linguistic theory · 2018
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicPhonetics and Phonology Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVariety (cybernetics)Discontinuity (linguistics)LinguisticsPsychologyComputer scienceArtificial intelligencePhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In a language spoken in a minority setting, sociolinguistic variation is often reduced. This paper examines rhythm in Ontario French and explores the presence and extent of such variation. Text readings and spontaneous samples from men and women of two age groups are compared, and the following rhythmic aspects are examined: articulation rate, syllabic structure and typology, length of a stress group, syllable and vowel duration ratios within a stress group, and phonetic rhythm (using nPVI-V, VarcoV, and %V metrics). The results suggest that style and social factors affect rate and rhythmicity but do not interact: all participants articulated more slowly when reading; also, women and older participants demonstrated a more French-like rhythm, while younger participants appeared converging to English.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.693
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.058
GPT teacher head0.341
Teacher spread0.282 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it