Preliminary results for measurement and classification of overnight wandering by dementia patient using multi-sensors
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The measurement and detection of overnight wandering is a significant issue for dementia patients and their caregivers such as a spouse. The wandering places the patient at risk of injury or even death if they fall or leave their residence without being detected. While it also causes stress and reduced sleep for the caregiver as they try to remain alert to the actions of their partner. This paper presents initial data for the first participant from an ongoing study of dementia patients where a wander detection and diversion system based on low-cost commercial sensors has been deployed into the residence. The paper shows that over a 3-week period, the analysis and classification of the sensor data is able to measure the behavior of the patient. In this period, the patient only used the washroom overnight and did not wander into other parts of the residence. These early results show that an off the shelf system targeted for residential security and home automation applications based on low-cost sensors supported with automated analysis and classification has the potential to be used to assist caregivers and dementia patients.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it